Levchin said the court order to "write code to surveil its customers is unprecedented." Since the very beginning, the government has reiterated that this would be a one-time case, but Levchin has sided with Apple, suggesting there were are no absolute guarantees.
"I'm sure it's possible to build code that only runs only on this particular phone, but by extension, it's true that they can write code that works on any other iPhone, yours for example, or your laptop or my laptop," Levchin said.
One question that has surfaced amidst the heated debate is why the government cannot hack into the phone without Apple's assistance, but Levchin said that was "impossible."
- Can Apple design an iPhone even it can't hack?
- "Angry" San Bernardino families back FBI on iPhone hack
- Do Americans think Apple should unlock terrorist's iPhone?
"The security within the iPhone today is strong enough where the company itself has means to unlock it if they're compelled to do so, but the best hacker in the world without Apple's help could not," Levchin said.
Levchin said by bringing the debate to the public, Cook wants to carry it Congressand the Supreme Court, to have "a clear set of laws created because there isn't anything on the books today."
"I think we're ultimately worried about the precedent," Levchin said, alluding to other recent scandals including CIA's waterboarding tactic and NSA surveillance. "We have put aside the conversation of what's important to us as a society, as a country, in favor of solving the problem that is immediately in front of us and subsequently, we found ourselves soul searching over and over again, and I think that's what (Apple) is trying to prevent."
© 2016 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment